Serious 4chan-PSL genealogizing is wrong--it’s nothing like the “forums”

[fries]

Neets net trannies have lots and lots of misplaced vitriol towards the other Masterverse websites but IMO it’s just a problem of you not getting it.

They’re meant to be “bad”. When your format is “anything goes”, the regression is pre-programmed.
You need to enjoy it like a circus or a zoo [ethnics are subanimals] and if your noblesse oblige becomes this faggy need to effort-post, if you get weepy, if you actually go, “THIS IS THE END OF GAYJEETS.ME, GOODBYE FOLKS” – you’ve kinda lost the plot here.
Your misplaced nostalgia means jack shit.

Most of my presence online is forever lost to time but I really am honest when I say that I understand all of this, I’ve been here before.
It’s like Lipstick Alley. It’s like the local news comment sections. It’s the unhinged Facebook.
They all have the same self-important kooks that very carefully build granular strings of personal lore (you can’t do that on 4troon for obvious reasons) – the only way to beat them is hitting them with Jewish sincerity: take them seriously, ask questions, write cross-examination paragraphs. Comedy comes from you taking a killshot only to intentionally miss by a few centimeters, these people hate being unseen slightly more than realizing that someone out there could *get* them.

The idée reçue of “normal people” is correct only when it assumes that dysregulation is the norm – idiosyncrasy by its own is abundant and cheap.
dbdr talks about this a lot but America in general is just an insane place with nothing for you to do and no other soul for you to meet; even the South is flavorless and gay.
The place that I’m originally from (not originally-originally) is actually a “touristy” place which only means that it’s basically a... meme. It's overcast and looks dead most of the year, it’s filled with identical IPA breweries and taco shops that all end with “-berto”. The tourists themselves are ugly just like the businesses that rip them off, every “fancy” and “upscale” eatery SUCKS bla bla bla – it's all just a big joke!

Hating blacks is easy but something about the Glock switch Bantu-chaos and perforated sheboons oozing out fat faster than blood is closer to the Truth than I would like to admit…

 

[Neet194012940]

you either have schizophrenia or a condition very similar to it induced by only using your language capacities to read and post schizophrenic rambling online

 

[rekamaður]

You act like this isn’t a symptom of human nature in general
4troon users go on about how the site peaked x years ago, people reminisce about the good old days when they do the exact same things now, even 13 year olds lament about how things were better when they were 9
There’s a reason people always say the site “peaked” right when they joined

 

[クーロ]

"Participants who experienced a decrease in the prevalence of blue dots were more likely to identify dots as blue when those dots appeared on a final trial than when those dots appeared on an initial trial. In other words, when the prevalence of blue dots decreased, participants’ concepts of blue expanded to include dots that it had previously excluded. This study did not address whether this kind of concept change was limited to prevalence decreases, or if it could occur with any kind of prevalence change. Study 2 was designed to address this question."

"Participants who experienced an increase in the prevalence of blue dots were less likely to identify dots as blue when those dots appeared on a final trial than when those dots appeared on an initial trial. In other words, when the prevalence of blue dots increased, participants’ concepts of blue contracted to exclude dots that it had previously included.
The results of studies 1 and 2 suggest that participants do not use information about their original decision threshold of a target to keep that threshold from moving after a prevalence change, at least in the domain of color perception. One potential reason for this is that participants in Studies 1 and 2 may have been surprised by the prevalence deviating from 50%, even when they were generally warned that the prevalence could change at any time. To further investigate whether this was a concern, and whether I could observe any conscious control over target expansion, in Study 3 I tried to explicitly warn participants about how the prevalence 21 would change. I predicted that warning participants about a prevalence decrease beforehand would prevent them from expanding their conceptual boundaries"

From: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/...june2018_revision3.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y

 

[micropenis29]

explain it like i'm 5

 

[Deleted member 1462]

dnr

 

[daylily]

ok

 

[Riddler]

explain it like i'm 5

It's basically this skit

Bill Hicks is basically the userbase of this forum and the "marketers" are the "looksmax invaders" or fakecels or whoever

Any attempt to be sincere like Bill is (jokingly) being is just fuel for the onlookers

Except Bill himself is deliberately getting worked up for a joke, if you are actually worked up, you are the joke

Master forums and all that are supposed to be like a Charlie Chaplin vaudeville ting. If you take it so seriously you're genuinely pissed about "invaders", you become an idiot getting hit in the face with a pie