Depression A billion doesn't make you anything

[RNT]

I was munching on pelmeni with smetana and clicking through Youtube videos on TV - and a video with Andrew Tate popped up. He sits down with a former Italian mobster to talk things over and all is fine until he suddenly goes off on a tangent to talk about his low social status (this is the first video I ever seen by him and had no idea what to expect).

So, what's interesting is that a man with $700 mn networth finds himself completely alien to ruling elites of either the UK or the US - the playback is set on the moment he talks about this.

​

This observation by mr. Kickboxer is in accordance with an old study by American sociologist William Lloyd Warner, who in a then-famous work "The Yankee City" questioned different social strates in the Unites States and asked them which people they considered their peers and which are the guys way above. Businessmen and rich people, as it turns out, were always simple people with no entry to American elite! "Zuckerbergs", and "Bezos", and "Gates", and "Musks" HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CLOWNS.

And who the fuck are rich people in the UK? There's not a single name! We only vaguely remember that clown launching tourists into space - but not even his name.

 

[Riddler]

I'd be highly skeptical of his $700m claim. You Google his net worth and see a slew of claims from 10m to 900m, lol. And I can hear the pajeet accent in all of them

The estimated net worth for the CEO of pinterest maxes out at 150m and he is more plausible than tate

 

[RNT]

I'd be highly skeptical of his $700m claim. You Google his net worth and see a slew of claims from 10m to 900m, lol. And I can hear the pajeet accent in all of them

Well, his house is speclated to be worth $37 mn and you don't buy these things on mortgage

Asset or Source of Income	Contribution to Net Worth
Hustler’s University	~$11 million per month
War Room	~$8 million per year
Casino business	$1 million per month
Crypto investments	$150 million (estimated)
Real estate investments	$10 million (estimated)
Car collection	$20+ million
Total Net Worth	~$400 million

*source

I started to write about Pavel Durov and decided it's beyond the point. Pavel Durov guy with his $15 bn networth - all he can buy is material things, he was unceremoniously chased off two countries, got beaten up by negroes on ADL orders and can just as easily be chased off Dubai shall things change. He has no leverage on any country's intelligence services or monetary policies, a private man with fear for his life.

 

[Lain]

Why should he automatically be high status? Because he has wealth? A NEET that makes it big through BTC won't suddenly be part of the ruling elite simply because he's wealthy. The ruling elite are people that have deep financial interests that tie to national security and people that make the decisions directly, it'd be terrible if any wealthy person suddenly joined that ruling elite. Imagine Beyonce having a direct say in the direction of the country of course you can always argue that people like Musk, Zuckerberg, Gates and various celebrities have an indirect but very major influence on society, I recall Edward Bernays talking about this.

He said that around 300 people, give or take, control the vast majority of people's opinions and beliefs, some of these 300 people may not be aware that they're one of those people but they do anyways. Think of people like pewdiepie, just a video game streamer, right? But he's reached such a level of sway and influence, when he starts using conservative bulletpoints, kids eat it up. How many people he's influenced is unknown but far far more I'd say than 99.99% of random individuals in society that try to influence people (with intent to do so or not). Funny how someone streaming Minecraft can do that, isn't it?

 

[RNT]

I recall Edward Bernays talking about this.

He said that around 300 people, give or take, control the vast majority of people's opinions and beliefs, some of these 300 people may not be aware that they're one of those people but they do anyways.

I imagine America as ruled by 12 seats of power, each in turn subdivided by 12 subordinate seats until known figures are visible.

12 Apostles
144 Saints
1728 Elders
20,736 Elect
248,832 Sages

Sage = first generation elitarian and equivalent to high degree in Freemasonry, maybe between 9° and 12°.

Also it is interesting to note Freemasonry membership slides down in numbers - they no longer recruit from the masses and prepare to crash down the ship.

 

[WestEuropoor]

I'd be highly skeptical of his $700m claim. You Google his net worth and see a slew of claims from 10m to 900m, lol. And I can hear the pajeet accent in all of them

The estimated net worth for the CEO of pinterest maxes out at 150m and he is more plausible than tate

How much does the CEO of neets.net make?

 

[Riddler]

Well, his house is speclated to be worth $37 mn and you don't buy these things on mortgage

Asset or Source of Income	Contribution to Net Worth
Hustler’s University	~$11 million per month
War Room	~$8 million per year
Casino business	$1 million per month
Crypto investments	$150 million (estimated)
Real estate investments	$10 million (estimated)
Car collection	$20+ million
Total Net Worth	~$400 million

*source

I started to write about Pavel Durov and decided it's beyond the point. Pavel Durov guy with his $15 bn networth - all he can buy is material things, he was unceremoniously chased off two countries, got beaten up by negroes on ADL orders and can just as easily be chased off Dubai shall things change. He has no leverage on any country's intelligence services or monetary policies, a private man with fear for his life.

I agree with the point. He could amass 10b and still be overpowered by AG Sulzberger, chairman of the NYT. It's telling the largest share here comes from crypto which is the most hazy

How much does the CEO of neets.net make?

Ngl I always wondered how much money master makes. Enough to buy his ahh a personal trainer and surgeries at least

 

[Lain]

I imagine America as ruled by 12 seats of power, each in turn subdivided by 12 subordinate seats until known figures are visible.

12 Apostles
144 Saints
1728 Elders
20,736 Elect
248,832 Sages

Sage = first generation elitarian and equivalent to high degree in Freemasonry, maybe between 9° and 12°.

Also it is interesting to note Freemasonry membership slides down in numbers - they no longer recruit from the masses and prepare to crash down the ship.

I think it's more that freemasonry is boring rather than they've started to become selective, I doubt they recruit online and there's less people outside willing to be recruited. There's lodges everywhere, my father was once invited by a friend, there used to be a lodge in the city I grew up in. My father has spent most of his life working in a metal factory or menial labour jobs, I don't think it's the super secret kids club that people would like to believe in. I believe when they say that it's a group of individuals that try to promote each other to be their best version, using religion and ingroup thinking to push one another farther ahead. One pattern that you see with the elites is that they're always in some type of group, which tends to have a number of people that will likely be successful, it's something of a self fulfilling loop. You join an organization full of smart/successful people because they think you're at the very least smart or respectable in their eyes, because of ingroup and nepotism, they help you become successful, this repeats with members of the group.

It just goes to show that the world is ran by nepotism and the majority of the people, having zero connections and zero desire to get connections, will always lag behind. More important than talent or skill is the people you know. I'm reminded instantly of all the pajeets that are working at IT companies in the USA making 6 figures on a worker visa, solely because the hiring manager is Indian-American and has made it, so they hire their own people. The freemasons, various college fraternities, etc are just this. Joining something like Phi Beta Kappa, Delta Kappa Epsilon, etc would probably have more of an impact on your future success than anything else you do.

 

[RNT]

There's lodges everywhere, my father was once invited by a friend

Woah, woah, woah!

But how do you govern a state, theoretically speaking? Say, it's ancien régime in France - there's king, there's nobility and there's clergy (kill all three, if you're a Jacobin of course).

Nobility is sophisticated: they had aristocratic titles that outlied general familial status, dukes and counts are worlds apart.

But what's next? Uhh!!

Russians didn't like the whole "secret clubs" thing and aristocrats had Masonic ranks in the open - they were equated and directly correlated to military ranks: private, corporal, sergeant....

Table of Ranks - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I've heard a theory that Freemasonry had its origins in army - or, rather, navy. British Navy, that is.

Then it split into national variants - either benevolent to the state it resides in or hostile. Nazis clearly considered Freemasons an unwelcome presence in Germany and it might explain the reason why Britain and US decided to join the war against it (many historians find given reasons as absurd). Or why they have such a low level of historical discourse about HITLER.

Did you just tell us that you joined Freemasonry, Haruhi Suzumiya?

The only people that had the authority to speak about Freemasons' inner workings were the Nazis, both from domestic experience and as they conquered Europe.

If an important Freemason failed to flee, they could invite that guy for a talk and politely ask him questions (or extract his fingernails, it depends).

As they conquered Europe, the Germans forcibly dissolved Masonic organizations and confiscated their assets and documents wherever they established an occupation regime. After a lodge was closed, it was ransacked for membership lists, important library and archival items, furnishings, and other cultural artifacts. Items seized would be sent on to the appropriate German agency, primarily the SD and later, the RSHA.

As part of their propaganda campaign against Freemasonry, the Nazis and other local right-wing organizations mounted anti-Masonic exhibitions throughout occupied Europe. German-occupied Paris hosted an anti-Masonic exhibition in October 1940, as did German-occupied Brussels in February 1941. Displaying Masonic ritual and cultural artifacts stolen from lodges, such exhibitions aimed to ridicule and direct hatred towards Freemasons and to heighten fears of a Jewish-Masonic conspiracy.

Because many of the Freemasons who were arrested were also Jews and/or members of the political opposition, it is not known how many individuals were placed in Nazi concentration camps and/or were targeted only because they were Freemasons. Some former lodge members, as individuals, participated in or were associated with German resistance circles. Some were arrested and murdered during World War II.

Surely a bunch of powerful individuals will be very pro-Nazi after this. And we don't even know their names.

Imagine if something like this happened in the US and we had an opportunity to go through lodges' member lists and see what's what.