Discussion Schizoprehnia is as bad as autism

frightfulcel

frightfulcel

pyramidcel
Sep 9, 2022
2,042
1748815025115


@RNT has stated the autist-schizo hypothesis, now given the autism male ferlity rate is .2 (so 20% of male autists reproduce), and the male schizoprehnic reproduction rate is similar (even lower which is brutal however some diagnosed autists may have grown out of autism so its likely even), it concludes to me that autism and schizoprenia are just as bad as eachother.

As someone whos been homeless, a lot of the people in the shelters have schizoprehnia. They don't really wash themselves and they don't talk to anyone all day. A funny thing is Impaired facial expressions of emotions have been described as characteristic symptoms of schizophrenia, which is similar to autism.

Both autistic people and schizophrenics can't really hold down a job which is interesting. Substance abuse uesrs seem to have an ok reproductive rate vs autists and schizos, which isn't suprising to me given theres crazy people who I see with partners.

Autism is almost a requirement for inceldom, howevever so is schizoprehnia. Most couples are looksmatched don't forget, its just that women don't want to date emotionally/neurologically dead people, they would rather date drug addicts with mental issues.
 
RNT

RNT

Eternal Night
Aug 23, 2023
1,871
Do you read actual research papers on psychiatry? To be honest, I treat that as a funny affair and only read hard science.

On the rare occasion when I do that, I look up papers on Google Scholar:

And if PDF is not available for download right there, I copy-paste URL to one of Sci-Hub mirrors:

And voila, there's a PDF in 99% of cases.

Sci-Hub is run by an autistic girl from Russia and it's a very strange story. She pursues theology studies and writes not very decipherable walls of text.
 
Last edited:
frightfulcel

frightfulcel

pyramidcel
Sep 9, 2022
2,042
Do you read actual research papers on psychiatry? To be honest, I treat that as a funny afair and only read hard science.

On the rare occasion when I do that, I look up papers on Google Scolar:

And if PDF is not available for download right there, I copy-paste URL to one of Sci-Hub mirrors:

And voila, there's a PDF in 99% of cases.

Sci-Hub is run by an autistic girl from Russia and it's a very strange story. She pursues theology studies and writes not very decipherable walls of text.
I don't read a lot given executive dysfunction (from autism) makes it difficult to read more than a few sentences, I can make it waay less severe if I was to stop eating goyslop but I just can't get around to it (brutal cycle). Even if I were to make it less severe though my strength is verbal reasoning rather than verbal comprehension, its why I made everyone either an INTJ or an INTP without thinking much about what these terms meant jfl. I really meant rigid vs unrgid minds etc.

I still think I need to read more though, I've gotten into situations that could have been avoided with some knowledge on sociopaths for example, or narcassists. I think coming to conclusions after the fact can be dangerous sometimes, you don't want to be an expert at surviving a bear attack from experience, rather from reading up on it jfl.

With theology, epistemology, logical fallacies etc. I have already come up with most of it in my own head without every reading into it, however it means I would suck at a debate given I haven't put my thoughts into terms.

I think that due to autism (aka leaky gut + heavy metal disease) all my thinking processes have gone into verbal reasoning, leaving everything else mediocre. However it could just be from autism and perhaps I can increase my ability in other areas, or maybe its fixed this way I have no idea.

I know its not much to do with what you wrote, but I'm just explaining why I don't read that much and just throw hypotheisis's out constantly. I do however have to read more.
 
RNT

RNT

Eternal Night
Aug 23, 2023
1,871
I know its not much to do with what you wrote, but I'm just explaining why I don't read that much and just throw hypotheisis's out constantly. I do however have to read more.
My "psychology school" is mid century European and Carl Jung and his pupils are enough. They have dealt with a lot of people and helped them.

Americans are uncultured swine and their knee-jerk reaction is to feed pills, and never know a foreign language.

It's enough to say that in the 1960s, they still found Freud and something new and exciting: 50 years after the fact. I picked up on that form Nabokov interview to Playboy (?!), where the interviewer was questioning that high-ranked noble (for a sec) about some long-forgotten Freud - whom he abhorred.
 
frightfulcel

frightfulcel

pyramidcel
Sep 9, 2022
2,042
My "psychology school" is mid century European and Carl Jung and his pupils are enough. They have dealt with a lot of people and helped them.

Americans are uncultured swine and their knee-jerk reaction is to feed pills, and never know a foreign language.

It's enough to say that in the 1960s, they still found Freud and something new and exciting: 50 years after the fact. I picked up on that form Nabokov interview to Playboy (?!), where the interviewer was questioning that high-ranked noble (for a sec) about some long-forgotten Freud - whom he abhorred.
I feel like this is going over my head jfl
 
Activity
So far there's no one here

Similar threads

N
Replies
2
Views
76
neetDrakula7
N
N
Replies
13
Views
150
overeitherway
overeitherway
frightfulcel
Replies
6
Views
360
glitch
glitch
D
Replies
7
Views
237
Zangano1
Zangano1
N
Replies
21
Views
381
chudur-budur
chudur-budur
Top