gigacel123
NEET
- Dec 3, 2020
- 1,211
I think the blackpill has overlooked one thing and its the looks scale.
Look at the Tinder studies,
"0% most attractive". The top tier male - chad on our 1-10 scale. Does not exist in their eyes. Our chad is their CHADLITE.
CHAD DOES NOT EXIST IN WOMEN'S MINDS, HE IS LITERALLY TOO GOOD TO EXIST FOR THEM. OUR "CHAD" is not even top tier for them. Our scale shifts one degree lower due to this. Even a 6'5 Henry Cavill with NW0 would good enough but not perfect enough for them. So at minimum the new adjusted scale would look like parallel to the original scale something like this:
Chad becomes chadlite
Chadlite becomes high tier normie
High tier normie becomes mid
Mid becomes low
Low becomes failed normie
Failed becomes incel
Incel becomes Deformed
Deformed becomes Non-Human
Of course this is all according to the looks scale. Chadlite is Chadlite to us in theory. But in a weighted scale, he is high tier normie in the shifted paradigm.
Look at the Tinder studies,
"0% most attractive". The top tier male - chad on our 1-10 scale. Does not exist in their eyes. Our chad is their CHADLITE.
CHAD DOES NOT EXIST IN WOMEN'S MINDS, HE IS LITERALLY TOO GOOD TO EXIST FOR THEM. OUR "CHAD" is not even top tier for them. Our scale shifts one degree lower due to this. Even a 6'5 Henry Cavill with NW0 would good enough but not perfect enough for them. So at minimum the new adjusted scale would look like parallel to the original scale something like this:
Chad becomes chadlite
Chadlite becomes high tier normie
High tier normie becomes mid
Mid becomes low
Low becomes failed normie
Failed becomes incel
Incel becomes Deformed
Deformed becomes Non-Human
Of course this is all according to the looks scale. Chadlite is Chadlite to us in theory. But in a weighted scale, he is high tier normie in the shifted paradigm.
