Discussion Theory: America is so crazy and stupid because they are circumcised

[Nuke]

Circumcision is one of the most evil practices I could think of. As soon as a male child is born the first experience he has is someone slicing a part of his genitals off.

Jew doctors say that the baby doesnt remember it but of course they do. They have a shock response from extreme pain in a sensitive area. That shit will follow you throughout your life. If circumcision doesn't do anything to a babys brain then why not make the argument for sexual abuse or drug use? Why not get a baby on heroin?

You see, circumcision is excused because it transforms the nation into what they want. They want a nation of impulsive morons looking to distract themselves with tasty food, bright lights, ism's and division to take their mind away from their genital mutilation. When you sexually mutilate your population, they are prime targets for indoctrination and believing in collective ideas at once to carry out the will of the controller.

The fact is, the world controllers are so happy with their American cattle, they even let them own guns knowing 90% of them are too dumb, fat or lazy to challenge their authority in any meaningful way. But notice how they made quick work of European national gun ownership capabilities from Lisbon to Moscow. Europe doesn't perform circumcision.

Same thing over here in UK. Circumcision is only popular amongst muslims. Whites don't do it and so the state needs to be more authoritarian to have the same societal effects as it does in relaxed America.

Thats my theory anyway...

 

[patientfrog]

the reason people get so upset by circumcision is because they think they would have more sexual pleasure if they weren't circumcised.

 

[Nuke]

the reason people get so upset by circumcision is because they think they would have more sexual pleasure if they weren't circumcised.

They would. I am uncircumcised and orgasms are a religious experience. It is increadibly powerful and a keratinized cut penis doesnt have the same sensitivity due to scar tissue

 

[patientfrog]

They would. I am uncircumcised and orgasms are a religious experience. It is increadibly powerful and a keratinized cut penis doesnt have the same sensitivity due to scar tissue

other than what you've heard from others, do you have any reason to believe sexual pleasure would be less if you were circumcised?

 

[Nuke]

other than what you've heard from others, do you have any reason to believe sexual pleasure would be less if you were circumcised?

As I said, cut penis has less active nerve endings than uncut due to scar tissue. So it absolutely would be less pleasurable

 

[patientfrog]

As I said, cut penis has less active nerve endings than uncut due to scar tissue. So it absolutely would be less pleasurable

yes, but you've heard that from others.

 

[Nuke]

yes, but you've heard that from others.

no all you have to do is look up. 'uncut penis head vs cut penis head' and you will see the difference yourself

 

[patientfrog]

no all you have to do is look up. 'uncut penis head vs cut penis head' and you will see the difference yourself

you're not answering the question. discussion over.

 

[Nuke]

you're not answering the question. discussion over.

If I stick a hot knife in my eye and scar tissue covers over my eye are you seriously going to make a song and dance about if I can really see or not?

 

[patientfrog]

If I stick a hot knife in my eye and scar tissue covers over my eye are you seriously going to make a song and dance about if I can really see or not?

hot knife in eye creates burn marks, not the same as circumcision.

 

[Nuke]

hot knife in eye creates burn marks, not the same as circumcision.

it creates scar tissue just as circumcision does. it is exactly the same. the usefulness of the organ is diminished.

Strange that you are struggling with this

 

[patientfrog]

it creates scar tissue just as circumcision does. it is exactly the same. the usefulness of the organ is diminished.

Strange that you are struggling with this

not the same. in burn marks, the skin is fried and charred with heat, skin blackens and peels in 3rd degree burns for instance. nerves die to heat, not severence. not the same. again, you're not answering the original question.

 

[Nuke]

not the same. in burn marks, the skin is fried and charred with heat, skin blackens and peels in 3rd degree burns for instance. not the same.

do you understand what happens during 3rd degree burns? you don't just have 'burn marks' forever. the body heals through scar tissue which diminishes sensitivity.

in circumcision, the open wound heals over with scar tissue, the glands rub against fabric for a lifetime and creates scar tissue diminishing sensitivity

 

[patientfrog]

do you understand what happens during 3rd degree burns? you don't just have 'burn marks' forever. the body heals through scar tissue which diminishes sensitivity.

in circumcision, the open wound heals over with scar tissue, the glands rub against fabric for a lifetime and creates scar tissue diminishing sensitivity

just answer the original question.

 

[Nuke]

just answer the original question.

I already have

Question:
do you have any reason to believe sexual pleasure would be less if you were circumcised?

answer:
scar tissue

If you don't understand this now then I will assume you are trolling and i'll have to stop the discussion

 

[patientfrog]

I already have

Question:
do you have any reason to believe sexual pleasure would be less if you were circumcised?

answer:
scar tissue

If you don't understand this now then I will assume you are trolling and i'll have to stop the discussion

you missed the critical first part of the question, so i ignore what you say.

 

[Neetgod]

Circumcision is one of the most evil practices I could think of. As soon as a male child is born the first experience he has is someone slicing a part of his genitals off.

Jew doctors say that the baby doesnt remember it but of course they do. They have a shock response from extreme pain in a sensitive area. That shit will follow you throughout your life. If circumcision doesn't do anything to a babys brain then why not make the argument for sexual abuse or drug use? Why not get a baby on heroin?

You see, circumcision is excused because it transforms the nation into what they want. They want a nation of impulsive morons looking to distract themselves with tasty food, bright lights, ism's and division to take their mind away from their genital mutilation. When you sexually mutilate your population, they are prime targets for indoctrination and believing in collective ideas at once to carry out the will of the controller.

The fact is, the world controllers are so happy with their American cattle, they even let them own guns knowing 90% of them are too dumb, fat or lazy to challenge their authority in any meaningful way. But notice how they made quick work of European national gun ownership capabilities from Lisbon to Moscow. Europe doesn't perform circumcision.

Same thing over here in UK. Circumcision is only popular amongst muslims. Whites don't do it and so the state needs to be more authoritarian to have the same societal effects as it does in relaxed America.

Thats my theory anyway...

I'm good off an elephant trunk dong. My dick gets plenty of sensation when I'm in the p. If I ever have a son he will definitely be getting circumcision. Imagine a chad with an ain't eater cock. Such a waist. Circumcision moggs.

 

[patientfrog]

"other than what you've heard from others"...

 

[Nuke]

"other than what you've heard from others"...

I have a friend who was circumcised later in life due to phimosis. He confirms the difference is big.

I can only rely on what he has said and my own critical thinking skills. The more scartissue and keratinization on a sensitive area, the less sensitive it will become.

If we use your method of deducing reality then you will have to second guess whether bricks really exist or the sky or if you are trapped inside of a coma and none of this is real.

That gets you nowhere

 

[patientfrog]

I have a friend who was circumcised later in life due to phimosis. He confirms the difference is big.

I can only rely on what he has said and my own critical thinking skills. The more scartissue and keratinization on a sensitive area, the less sensitive it will become.

If we use your method of deducing reality then you will have to second guess whether bricks really exist or the sky or if you are trapped inside of a coma and none of this is real.

That gets you nowhere

still doesn't answer the question, you heard it from him. and a big no to your second point. you can have direct experience of bricks and being in a coma.

 

[Nuke]

still doesn't answer the question, you heard it from him.

If we use your method of deducing reality then you will have to second guess whether bricks really exist or the sky or if you are trapped inside of a coma and none of this is real.

That gets you nowhere

 

[patientfrog]

If we use your method of deducing reality then you will have to second guess whether bricks really exist or the sky or if you are trapped inside of a coma and none of this is real.

That gets you nowhere

you've never seen a brick? you've never seen a sky? you don't know whether or not you've been in a coma? those are things you can have direct personal experience of not filtered through anyone else.

 

[Nuke]

you've never seen a brick? you've never seen a sky? you don't know whether or not you've been in a coma? those are things you can have direct personal experience of not filtered through anyone else.

I can't say whether my 'sky' is the same as someone elses. We just trust that we can all see the same thing.

This line of thinking is broken and silly and pretentious

 

[patientfrog]

I can't say whether my 'sky' is the same as someone elses.

only because you've presumably heard that other people may experience it differently, such as the colorblind for instance.

you don't believe in the objective reality of the sky?

 

[Nuke]

only because you've presumably heard that other people may experience it differently, such as the colorblind for instance.

To me, this all sounds like 'babys first depersonalisation episode'. Shattering reality into a trillion pieces wondering if it is all real gets you nowhere. You'll realise in time

 

[patientfrog]

To me, this all sounds like 'babys first depersonalisation episode'. Shattering reality into a trillion pieces wondering if it is all real gets you nowhere. You'll realise in time

whatever you may think, i added more at the end of my reply.

 

[Nuke]

whatever you may think, i added more at the end of my reply.

my opinion doesnt change. if you only trust your own senses to know what is real then you havent really considered how much of a similar blueprint human beings are.

 

[patientfrog]

my opinion doesnt change. if you only trust your own senses to know what is real then you havent really considered how much of a similar blueprint human beings are.

you don't believe in the objective existence of the sky?

 

[Nuke]

you don't believe in the objective existence of the sky?

i do if i just said human beings are all roughly the same blueprint. seems like you arent reading my messages fully either

 

[patientfrog]

i do if i just said human beings are all roughly the same blueprint. seems like you arent reading my messages fully either

well, fair enough. i should apologize, i'm in an inquisitive arguing kinda mood. i do think you overemphasize the importance of sexual pleasure to an absurd degree and the fact you're conspiratorial about this is quite odd.

 

[Nuke]

well, fair enough. i should apologize, i'm in an inquisitive arguing kinda mood. i do think you overemphasize the importance of sexual pleasure to an absurd degree.

Considering how sexual human society always has and now is, I don't think I am. Even in cultures that suppress sexuality it is a big thing.

Sex is very important and sexual pleasure is massive otherwise there would be no incentive to reproduce

 

[Iberianeet]

the reason people get so upset by circumcision is because they think they would have more sexual pleasure if they weren't circumcised.

But it's partially true, since the part that gives you the sensation is constantly in friction, it wasn't meant to be exposed all the time.

 

[patientfrog]

Considering how sexual human society always has and now is, I don't think I am. Even in cultures that suppress sexuality it is a big thing.

Sex is very important and sexual pleasure is massive otherwise there would be no incentive to reproduce

you seem to be arguing circumcision is the most important factor of why people are impulsive. just weird.

i'm going for a drive, i'll read responses later.

 

[Nuke]

you seem to be arguing circumcision is the most important factor of why people are impulsive. just weird.

I am because it happens right after birth and the experience perminantly changes the brain because of the trauma response. That is the origin point.

 

[patientfrog]

I am because it happens right after birth and the experience perminantly changes the brain because of the trauma response. That is the origin point.

hmmmm. wouldn't birthing itself be a bigger trauma response? wouldn't the fact that babies are separated from their mother immediately be a larger trauma response? aren't babies anesthetized in circumcision anyway? doesn't life itself cause a larger trauma response? your position still seems weird.