Serious Wagie women are not serious romantic options

[NEETzschean]

If she’s a wagie I just can’t see how it would work:

1. She has a wagie income, meaning no relative or absolute need for a NEET’s (likely) more limited income

2. She probably won’t respect and will feel resentment (even disgust) for a man who doesn’t just get less money, he doesn't even “go on the hunt” while she does (her friends and family will also work to undermine you: “Why are you with that loser?”, “You can do better.” Etc.)

3. More personal but I’d want to spend a lot of time together, not share her with a job, coworkers, customers and boss like a cuckold

 

[n9wiff]

tying them up and going to pound town is the only romantic option

 

[hikikomori]

tying them up and going to pound town is the only romantic option

take them to lazy town

 

[n9wiff]

take them to lazy town

 

[Zghoiens]

• The problem is not women in low-wage jobs, but the poor idiot who provides them with a free life while he waits for a promise of true love.

 

[NEETzschean]

4. A wagie woman is more integrated into the system and is more likely to have internalised the system’s values, whereas you stand outside or in opposition to them, creating a psychological and existential gap that is usually unbridgeable

 

[jordan29]

3. More personal but I’d want to spend a lot of time together, not share her with a job, coworkers, customers and boss like a cuckold

You want to be her emotional tampon then?

Or do you want others to handle that job?

Use your brain, retard

 

[NEETzschean]

You want to be her emotional tampon then?

Or do you want others to handle that job?

Use your brain, retard

I feel sorry for you.

 

[Pale God]

First point is irrelevant unless you want to be betabuxxer.

Second point is accurate at least the part about her family disapproving that you aren't an exploited wage slave aswell.

Third point actually makes sense since she could become attracted to some guy at work she spends a lot of time with.

 

[NEETzschean]

First point is irrelevant unless you want to be betabuxxer.

Second point is accurate at least the part about her family disapproving that you aren't an exploited wage slave aswell.

Third point actually makes sense since she could become attracted to some guy at work she spends a lot of time with.

1. If you are both unemployed you aren’t necessarily being a betabuxxer, It inherently leans toward not being one. If a woman earns more than a man (or even has significant economic autonomy) she struggles to respect him, thus to find him attractive.

On 3., it’s also that she’s being worn out by work: time, energy, stress. You are getting the leftovers even if she isn’t cheating on you sexually!

What do you think of 4. A wagie woman is more integrated into the system and is more likely to have internalised the system’s values, whereas you stand outside or in opposition to them, creating a psychological and existential gap that is usually unbridgeable