Why do western normies hate pedophile so much?(serious question)

[tacticalskeleton]

While I do admit to enjoy posting Nazi or other political extremist materials to piss people off, this question is genuine one.
Westerner seems to have extra hatred for pedophiles, even more than any of other culture, being from Japan myself and having masturbated to loli hentai numerous times just like any other fellow japanese otaku, seeing so-called "pedophile freaks" receiving so much hate in mainstream social media has always drove me into confusion.

I see people advocating for LGBTQ+ rights saying very extreme things like "We should murder pedophiles on sight" "Pedophiles deserve to be executed in most painful method". Why do they hate it so much?
I do understand that LGBT would fear being accused of being pedo because they are both sexual degenerate who deviated from natural way of heterosexuality. so it's understandable to have overlap.
But how can a person who care for social justice can be sympathetic towards one group of sexual deviant, while being so cruel to other group of people? I'm sorry if anyone are offended reading this-I don't mean to offend.

I looked for image of pedobear in search engine and the "uncensored" duckduckgo didn't yield me any result with safe search turned off, I don't understand the necessity of these informational manipulation.

 

[Deleted member 2825]

I think it's just cuz the lgbt have finally found some power and the pedos would take that away since everyone hates pedos

 

[tacticalskeleton]

everyone hates pedos

This is the part I'm wondering, that doesn't happen in Japan. I've only seen this in english internet and the way they do it seems like psychopathic and hypocritical for me.

 

[Raffy_47]

Untermenschen need a scapegoat and rn these are "Nazi" and Pedo.

 

[hikikomori]

it’s cause they see children as sacred, innocent, and untouchable

also they’re sexually underdeveloped so being attracted to them makes no sense

 

[Deleted member 2019]

it’s cause they see children as sacred, innocent, and untouchable

also they’re sexually underdeveloped so being attracted to them makes no sense

Sure it doesn’t make sense but being attracted to other men makes no sense either, yet normies think literal faggots are normal while a guy who likes little girls needs to be beheaded

This is proof the average person is now retarded, thinks liking young girls is way worse than liking hairy bearded masculine men

 

[duke]

Because they're pedophiles in denial

 

[glitch]

assuming you mean pedophilia as attraction to teenage girls rather than by its true definition (liking prepubescent girls)

liking teenage girls being immoral was made up by post teenage women and men who are unable to attract teenage girls as a way of protecting themselves

 

[glitch]

and there is no limit for their ridiculousness. people will call a 50 year old man who’s attracted to 30 year old women a pedophile. it’s nothing to do with control or muh power imbalance for 99% of men, women just peak in attractiveness in their teens to mid twenties

 

[kanashimi no umi]

2 possible reasons are: people love discriminating others and pedophiles are safe to target because no one's gonna really defend them on a large scale. On the other hand, people can't (or don't want to) acknowledge the difference between simple attraction and actually offending.

 

[Deleted member 2019]

2 possible reasons are: people love discriminating others and pedophiles are safe to target because no one's gonna really defend them on a large scale. On the other hand, people can't (or don't want to) acknowledge the difference between simple attraction and actually offending.

But there’s no such thing as “actually offending”. Fucking a young girl isn’t doing anything wrong, it just goes against braindead cuck laws so it gets classed as something deviant

 

[kanashimi no umi]

But there’s no such thing as “actually offending”. Fucking a young girl isn’t doing anything wrong, it just goes against braindead cuck laws so it gets classed as something deviant

what do you consider "young girl"? anything 14+ isn't pedophilia

 

[Raffy_47]

what do you consider "young girl"? anything 14+ isn't pedophilia

It isn't even pedophilia 11-13. It's hebephilia.

 

[Deleted member 2019]

what do you consider "young girl"? anything 14+ isn't pedophilia

Obviously liking teens isn’t pedo i wasnt talking about that. Pedo range is under 10 usually. And even if someone is an actual pedo who fucks single digit age girls I couldn’t care less, its still way more normal than gay stuff ever will be, yet almost no one will admit this

 

[kanashimi no umi]

It isn't even pedophilia 11-13. It's hebephilia.

depends on development stage, I said 14+ because most will be in puberty by then

 

[kanashimi no umi]

Obviously liking teens isn’t pedo i wasnt talking about that. Pedo range is under 10 usually. And even if someone is an actual pedo who fucks single digit age girls I couldn’t care less, its still way more normal than gay stuff ever will be, yet almost no one will admit this

unless you have micro dick chance of serious injury is way higher than faggot sex

 

[Deleted member 2185]

I feel bad for pedos

 

[jovan andrade]

Because they're pedophiles in denial

 

[Unemployed]

It's a social construct. To understand why attraction to minors is considered morally reprehensible and legally unjustifiable, we need to look back at why Western societies felt the need to establish a legal age of consent. After all, romantic relationships with minors weren’t always illegal. For this, we largely have a Victorian-era British journalist, William Thomas Stead, to thank. He’s also considered one of the world’s first investigative journalists.

W. T. Stead - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In 1885, Stead wrote a multi-part exposé titled "The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon" for the Pall Mall Gazette. The series exposed how 'seducers' exploited young girls for profit. These adults would approach young girls, sweet-talk them, and lure them with false promises of marriage. They would take these girls from small towns to big cities, bring them to brothels, drug them, and allow depraved clients to take their virginity with little resistance.

Read the full story here. It's pretty fucking long:

https://www.salvationarmy.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/2020-10/Pam.R.77%20%27The%20Maiden%20Tribute%20of%20Modern%20Babylon%27.pdf

Some parents, who were poor or addicted to opium, would even sell their own children to these adults. Many girls were even sent to foreign countries like France, never to be heard from again. Things were getting out of control. Professional seducers and brothels exploited children for profit, causing immense trauma and trouble for society. This is why the government ultimately introduced the concept of the 'age of consent' to protect vulnerable children from seducers, brothels, sexual slavery, and human trafficking.

The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It’s important to note that Stead made it clear he wasn’t necessarily against adult men having romantic relationships with younger girls. He didn't agree with such relationships, but he believed it was ultimately up to the individuals involved. His primary concern was the exploitation of children who were unable to protect themselves from such abuse. That said, even before the legal age of consent was established, relationships between adults and very young children were generally viewed as wrong. Such relationships weren’t illegal, but they were far from socially acceptable or encouraged.

Here's my personal opinion: Adults who are attracted to minors are sick perverts. I'm glad sex between an adult and a minor is illegal in many Western countries as I believe it to be morally wrong. I have no sympathy for adults who go for children. If anything, I want the legal consequences to be much tougher. I'm usually against forced castration, but this is an area where i find it acceptabel. If I'm not mistaken, Nazi Germany and other Western nations that practiced eugenics during the 20th century used to castrate sexual perverts and criminals. I think we could bring it back. But this time, leave the LGBTQ+ community alone and go after the pedophiles.

P.S. I've reported you to @Master, @IGiveUp, and @Haruhi Suzumiya for sexualizing minors. It's against the rules of this forum and I expect you to get permanently banned. Goodbye!

RULES AND FAQ:
Do not sexualize minors in any way, shape, or form.

Rules and FAQ

Welcome to Neets.net! This community is for people who spend a lot of time at home, especially for NEETs - people who aren't currently working or studying. You don't have to be NEET to make an account. You're welcome to join if you enjoy the forum and find the discussion relatable. MEMBERSHIP...

neets.net

 

[Unemployed]

liking teenage girls being immoral was made up by post teenage women and men who are unable to attract teenage girls as a way of protecting themselves

This statement is factually incorrect and you're pretty damn stupid to even think so. You should be permanently banned for spreading misinformation like that. Read my previous message and shut the fuck up.

It's a social construct. To understand why attraction to minors is considered morally reprehensible and legally unjustifiable, we need to look back at why Western societies felt the need to establish a legal age of consent. After all, romantic relationships with minors weren’t always illegal. For this, we largely have a Victorian-era British journalist, William Thomas Stead, to thank. He’s also considered one of the world’s first investigative journalists.

W. T. Stead - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In 1885, Stead wrote a multi-part exposé titled "The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon" for the Pall Mall Gazette. The series exposed how 'seducers' exploited young girls for profit. These adults would approach young girls, sweet-talk them, and lure them with false promises of marriage. They would take these girls from small towns to big cities, bring them to brothels, drug them, and allow depraved clients to take their virginity with little resistance.

Read the full story here. It's pretty fucking long:

https://www.salvationarmy.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/2020-10/Pam.R.77%20%27The%20Maiden%20Tribute%20of%20Modern%20Babylon%27.pdf

Some parents, who were poor or addicted to opium, would even sell their own children to these adults. Many girls were even sent to foreign countries like France, never to be heard from again. Things were getting out of control. Professional seducers and brothels exploited children for profit, causing immense trauma and trouble for society. This is why the government ultimately introduced the concept of the 'age of consent' to protect vulnerable children from seducers, brothels, sexual slavery, and human trafficking.

The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It’s important to note that Stead made it clear he wasn’t necessarily against adult men having romantic relationships with younger girls. He didn't agree with such relationships, but he believed it was ultimately up to the individuals involved. His primary concern was the exploitation of children who were unable to protect themselves from such abuse. That said, even before the legal age of consent was established, relationships between adults and very young children were generally viewed as wrong. Such relationships weren’t illegal, but they were far from socially acceptable or encouraged.

Here's my personal opinion: Adults who are attracted to minors are sick perverts. I'm glad sex between an adult and a minor is illegal in many Western countries as I believe it to be morally wrong. I have no sympathy for adults who go for children. If anything, I want the legal consequences to be much tougher. I'm usually against forced castration, but this is an area where i find it acceptabel. If I'm not mistaken, Nazi Germany and other Western nations that practiced eugenics during the 20th century used to castrate sexual perverts and criminals. I think we could bring it back. But this time, leave the LGBTQ+ community alone and go after the pedophiles.

P.S. I've reported you to @Master, @IGiveUp, and @Haruhi Suzumiya for sexualizing minors. It's against the rules of this forum and I expect you to get permanently banned. Goodbye!

RULES AND FAQ:
Do not sexualize minors in any way, shape, or form.

Rules and FAQ

Welcome to Neets.net! This community is for people who spend a lot of time at home, especially for NEETs - people who aren't currently working or studying. You don't have to be NEET to make an account. You're welcome to join if you enjoy the forum and find the discussion relatable. MEMBERSHIP...

neets.net

 

[SuckyCuckyDuck]

While I do admit to enjoy posting Nazi or other political extremist materials to piss people off, this question is genuine one.
Westerner seems to have extra hatred for pedophiles, even more than any of other culture, being from Japan myself and having masturbated to loli hentai numerous times just like any other fellow japanese otaku, seeing so-called "pedophile freaks" receiving so much hate in mainstream social media has always drove me into confusion.

I see people advocating for LGBTQ+ rights saying very extreme things like "We should murder pedophiles on sight" "Pedophiles deserve to be executed in most painful method". Why do they hate it so much?
I do understand that LGBT would fear being accused of being pedo because they are both sexual degenerate who deviated from natural way of heterosexuality. so it's understandable to have overlap.
But how can a person who care for social justice can be sympathetic towards one group of sexual deviant, while being so cruel to other group of people? I'm sorry if anyone are offended reading this-I don't mean to offend.

View attachment 189863
I looked for image of pedobear in search engine and the "uncensored" duckduckgo didn't yield me any result with safe search turned off, I don't understand the necessity of these informational manipulation.

I know, right? Even I thought it was weird how western society looks down so much on that one particular thing compared to other heinous and vile acts.

 

[MelaninQueen]

I suppose you're referring to pubescent girls (because I don't find pre-pubescent girls to be sexually attractive in the slightest). The answer is moral corruption that only accelerated a few centuries ago. You can thank le "Enlightenment" period as one of the many motives behind the criminalization of "hebephilia". You're not guilty if you find teenage pubescent girls attractive (AKA sexually appealing), since it is pretty much a natural occurrence for men.