Lifestyle Why you should never get a gf

[RNT]

Word to Leo Tolstoy:

“Never, never marry, my dear fellow! That’s my advice: never marry till you can say to yourself that you have done all you are capable of, and until you have ceased to love the woman of your choice and have seen her plainly as she is, or else you will make a cruel and irrevocable mistake. Marry when you are old and good for nothing—or all that is good and noble in you will be lost. It will all be wasted on trifles. Yes! Yes! Yes! Don’t look at me with such surprise. If you marry expecting anything from yourself in the future, you will feel at every step that for you all is ended, all is closed except the drawing room, where you will be ranged side by side with a court lackey and an idiot!... But what’s the good?...” and he waved his arm.

And continued, he points out that if Napoleon Bonaparte had a gf he would have ended as a nobody

“You don’t understand why I say this,” he continued, “but it is the whole story of life. You talk of Bonaparte and his career,” said he (though Pierre had not mentioned Bonaparte), “but Bonaparte when he worked went step by step toward his goal. He was free, he had nothing but his aim to consider, and he reached it. But tie yourself up with a woman and, like a chained convict, you lose all freedom! And all you have of hope and strength merely weighs you down and torments you with regret.”

You have heard the wise man. The choice is yours.

 

[FlorentLBelle]

-has a gf

 

[ZZebra786]

I want sax slave to reproduce with not the illusion of impressing or being liked by other males like napoleon, that is gaya.

 

[MHCheese454]

Word to Leo Tolstoy:


And continued, he points out that if Napoleon Bonaparte had a gf he would have ended as a nobody


You have heard the wise man. The choice is yours.

View attachment 158558

Cope, + didn't read. Congrats, or sorry, idk

 

[MelaninQueen]

Cope. I want oxytocin, I'm sorry if you're asexual.

 

[Lain]

And continued, he points out that if Napoleon Bonaparte had a gf he would have ended as a nobody


You have heard the wise man. The choice is yours.

View attachment 158558

>Napoleon Bonaparte's first wife, Joséphine de Beauharnais, had several affairs during their marriage. Their relationship was complicated, and both were known to have extramarital relationships. Despite their tumultuous marriage, Napoleon was deeply in love with Joséphine, but ultimately divorced her in 1810 due to her inability to produce an heir.
>Joséphine de Beauharnais is believed to have had multiple lovers during her marriage to Napoleon Bonaparte. One of the more notable individuals was Hippolyte Charles, a French army officer.
>Descriptions often depict him as being tall, handsome, and charismatic.

 

[Lain]

Getting a gf/wife does limit ones breeding potential. I broke up with my gf recently because of that, even after Napoleon goes on a massive military spree winning, being as high status as possible, he only ends up with three offspring. Maybe I take things in a very literal biological sense but it seems like the most successful strategy overall is one that maximizes offspring. That one sperm donor who has 1000+ children I've mentioned before and has outcompeted virtually every king in human history with massive harems is imo, massively more successfully than Napoleon.

 

[Lain]

• Eugène de Beauharnais (1781-1824): He later became the Duke of Leuchtenberg and served as a viceroy of Italy under Napoleon.
• Hortense de Beauharnais (1783-1837): She married Louis Bonaparte, Napoleon's brother, and became the Queen of Holland. Hortense was the mother of Napoleon III, who later became the Emperor of France.

Brutal. She had a couple of kids from a previous marriage, manipulated Napoleon into giving them high status jobs and every time she was ovulating and ready for breeding, she would go have sex with other men. At the end of the day, poor Napoleon set up her gigachad offspring for success while he was off busy fighting his wars. Unironically NGMI. Terrible example used RNT.

 

[Unemployed]

Lifestyle Why you should never get a gf​

Every man of high value has a girlfriend. Sometimes multiple.

Like it or not, that's how men keep score.

 

[Deleted member 2463]

Every man of high value has a girlfriend. Sometimes multiple.

Like it or not, that's how men keep score.

Kafka and Ted Kaczynski never had an actual girlfriend; their work is widely recognized by many and still relevant. On the other hand, there are people who had multiple girlfriends but were worth nothing, like Charles Manson. If you talk about Normie, then their value is only transient in their life span, not alone non-humans who are living among us.

 

[UglyBastard]

There is something transcendental about marriage. I know that the modern woman is a despicable being and that we live in a pussyfascism, where women have rights and men have duties, where the state is ready to fuck you if a woman wants to. However, I can't agree that marriage in itself is harmful.
Not all men were born to be legends, most were born to make children out of women. When you are born without any special talent, like Napoleon Bonaparte, your moral and spiritual duty is to get married and have as many children as you can.
Realise that the problem is not marriage, but modern women. Just live in a traditional community, where women are taught to live as women from a young age.
If you're an anti-Christian atheist, then it's best not to have children at all so as not to spread this ideology around the world. I myself am an atheist, but I recognise the supremacy of Christianity because it is thanks to Christianity that we have a civilisation today. Unfortunately, the sons of bitches of the Enlightenment revolution have totally broken the order of civilisation and the moral and ethical foundations that have been built for millennia. It's up to us to try to restore medieval society, to teach our children how to behave and, most importantly of all, to keep them away from the internet, the city and school.
Country life should be the ultimate goal of any man who rejects modernity!

Reject modernity, embrace tradition.

 

[Pirate]

Getting a gf/wife does limit ones breeding potential. I broke up with my gf recently because of that,

She found the neet account

 

[Zangano1]

Im a nobody and I dont have a gf

 

[Brother Wagecuck]

i want like 3 girlfriends but they wouldnt know about each other.

 

[Unemployed]

Reject modernity, embrace tradition.

In the early 1900s, one popular idea was eugenics, the belief that the human race could be improved by controlling who gets to have children. There was a big push to create policies that made it harder for men considered "low value" to have kids because they were seen as bad for the overall gene pool.

Many incels today who "reject modernity" think that past intellectuals wouldn't like women being more selective about their partners. In reality, those intellectuals wanted the opposite. They believed that if women had the freedom to choose their partners, they would avoid weak and lazy men, which would help improve the race.

This belief was one reason behind Prohibition, the law that banned alcohol. Some scientists argued that children of people who drank alcohol would be inferior to those whose parents did not drink. They thought allowing alcohol would degrade the population and weaken the nation. The Ku Klux Klan also supported Prohibition for these reasons.

 

[hikikomori]

Getting a gf/wife does limit ones breeding potential. I broke up with my gf recently because of that, even after Napoleon goes on a massive military spree winning, being as high status as possible, he only ends up with three offspring. Maybe I take things in a very literal biological sense but it seems like the most successful strategy overall is one that maximizes offspring. That one sperm donor who has 1000+ children I've mentioned before and has outcompeted virtually every king in human history with massive harems is imo, massively more successfully than Napoleon.

‘the gf you mentioned here several times before ?

 

[General Alek]

i want like 3 girlfriends but they wouldnt know about each other.

same

 

[General Alek]

i want like 3 girlfriends but they wouldnt know about each other.

that would be a good way to get back at women and society

 

[Levi]

it is thanks to Christianity that we have a civilisation today

um what? The romans were doing great without it

 

[Lain]

‘the gf you mentioned here several times before ?

Yes, that one.

 

[UglyBastard]

um what? The romans were doing great without it

Nigga what the fuck? Today we have due process of law, colleges, hospitals, morality and ethics systematised in rites, cultures and traditions. If we were to depend on the Romans, we would still have pagan cults, child sacrifice, legal arbitrariness, severe illiteracy (some Roman emperors couldn't even read).
It was thanks to Christian navigators (especially the Spanish and us Portuguese) that we discovered the rest of the world. The intention was not money, places like America, for example, were known for inhabiting savage peoples and nothing interesting. It was thanks to the Jesuit priests that we had some civilisational progress in the world. Along with the great navigations also came the advance of science. If it hadn't been for the Catholic Church and its heavy investment in education, schools and universities, we wouldn't have had men like Mendel, Copernicus, Roger Bacon, Buridan, Stenus, Gassendi, Georges Lemaître and many others.
Whenever you leave your house and see buildings, architecture, engineering, science, the entire legal system, schools, universities and hospitals, remember: if it weren't for the Catholic Church, we'd still be killing babies in the pagan cults of the Romans.

 

[ThePisspot]

That one sperm donor who has 1000+ children I've mentioned before and has outcompeted virtually every king in human history with massive harems is imo, massively more successfully than Napoleon

 

[UglyBastard]

In the early 1900s, one popular idea was eugenics, the belief that the human race could be improved by controlling who gets to have children. There was a big push to create policies that made it harder for men considered "low value" to have kids because they were seen as bad for the overall gene pool.

Many incels today who "reject modernity" think that past intellectuals wouldn't like women being more selective about their partners. In reality, those intellectuals wanted the opposite. They believed that if women had the freedom to choose their partners, they would avoid weak and lazy men, which would help improve the race.

This belief was one reason behind Prohibition, the law that banned alcohol. Some scientists argued that children of people who drank alcohol would be inferior to those whose parents did not drink. They thought allowing alcohol would degrade the population and weaken the nation. The Ku Klux Klan also supported Prohibition for these reasons.

Good to know.
Eugenics is, in its core, a satanic idea. Any action towards conception is satanic. The idea behind "low value to society" is a materialistic idea, because the "high valued individual" is the one who contribute most to the capitalist society. The "low value" only tell you about utilitarism, you leave aside all the spiritual and cultural aspect of the human being. We are not slaves, we were born to create families, that's the most important thing.
Sorry for all that shit I just wrote, I'm drunk as fuck rn